🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to implement a newly configured congressional boundary scheme that is projected to include up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, grants a request by the state to overturn a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, creating considerable confusion and upsetting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

That lower court had determined that Texas had likely sorted voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the maps established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Opposition

With a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She argued that it disregarded the work of the lower court, noting that its opinion was actually authored by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, The majority's order guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated year in and year out, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Fight

This decision is part of a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, in response, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Responses

Lone Star State attorney general welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he stated.

Conversely, Democratic leaders criticized the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic campaign committee.

Another senior Democratic figure stated the court had once again damaged its legitimacy by upholding a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he concluded.